Friday, April 17, 2026

The Geopolitics of Railway - English

 



In a world that is witnessing some very disturbing geopolitical turbulence, I discuss with journalist Antoine PECQUEUR his remarkable book, “Geopolitics of Railways”.  Antoine is a freelance journalist who writes regularly for the Mediapart, Le Monde Diplomatique, Alternatives Économiques and several other renowned French media houses.

In this book, Antoine deals in detail 25 railway lines that are located in some of world’s geopolitically most sensitive (armed, commercial or migratory) locations.  

Here are few of the major railway lines that we discuss:

Europe

🔆 Rail Baltica: Integration of the Baltic countries into the European network.

🔆 Austria, European hub for night trains

Asia

🔆 Samjhauta Express :  Friendship at the heart of the Indo-Pakistani conflict

🔆 The new Silk Road railways, the Belt and Road Initiative

🔆 Beijing – Lhasa: the assimilation policy of China goes via the rail

🔆 China – Japan: The High-Speed Rail War

America

🔆 Canada: The First Nations Train

🔆 North America: A Cross-Border Network

Africa

🔆 Tanzara: Pioneer of China-Africa

🔆 West Africa:  Vincent BOLLORE's dream of a railway loop

Middle East

🔆 Transasia:  in the face of a fragile truce between Turkey and Iran

We highlight the vital role of railways to connect nations, people and ideas. And the discussion concludes by celebrating the virtues of Railway in favour of the environment but also by cautioning against the possible danger of greenwashing.

Note:

1) Simultaneous subtitles are provided in two (French and Hindi) languages.

Link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hKD9Z2V7gIc

2) This interview could be read in the form of an article in the following languages:  English, French, German, Marathi, Hindi, Malayalam, Bengali and Kannada. 




Anubandh: Hello! My name is Anubandh KATÉ.

I am a railway engineer  based in Paris and today,  the topic that I have chosen,  it is also about the railway.  And with me, I have Antoine PECQUEUR. 

Antoine: Hello Anubandh!

Anubandh: Hello Antoine! 

Antoine is a freelance journalist. I will introduce him briefly before we begin the discussion. 

So, Antoine was born in 1981, after the launch of  the first French TGV (Train à Grande Vitesse).  It was indeed on 22nd September 1981  between Paris and Lyon.  And MITTERAND… François MITTERAND had inaugurated it. Antoine, as I told you, is an independent journalist. Antoine writes regularly for the  “Mediapart,” and for “Le Monde.” He has worked at “Le Monde”  between 2006-2012. Also, he writes occasionally  for "Le Monde Diplomatique"  as well as for the "Economic Alternative".  Antone was editor-in-chief of  « La Lettre du Musicien »,  between   and he also collaborates  with “Radio France Internationale - RFI”,  “France Musique” and the “Mezzo” channel. He is also the artistic director of the music festival  « Corde sur Ciel ». He is a specialist of  cultural economies and  he is a bassoonist.

Antoine has published several books. The first one was in 2007, « Les écrans sonores de Stanley Kubrick ».  In 2011, « Il Diluvio Universale ». It is a biographical and musicological study  on the life of Michelangelo FALVETTI.  FALVETTI is a 17th century Sicilian composer.  In 2013, it was « Les Plus Beaux Opéras du Monde » and perhaps that is  why the other day you  made a comment about the Massy Opera House  when we spoke on the phone. In 2015, it was « le Métier de  Musicien d'Orchestre ».  In 2016, « Les Espaces de la Musique :  Architecture des Salles de Concert et des Opéras ». In 2021, a very interesting book;  « Atlas de la Culture du Soft Power au Hard Power :  Comment la culture prend le pouvoir ».  And in 2021, the book we are going to  speak today, « La Géopolitique du Rail :  le Train au Cœur des Enjeux Contemporains ». 

And apart from that, you obviously love to travel.  You enjoy learning languages,  music and lots of other things. 

Is that correct?  Is something missing? 

Antoine: It is perfect! It is absolutely perfect!

Anubandh: Okay. Thank you. 

I am still going to say a word about Arthur BEAUBOIS-JUDE,  who is a cartographer and  who contributed  to this book.  And the maps are magnificent!  It is really something that I enjoyed in this book. 

Before we begin, may I  ask you; what was your idea, what was the inspiration behind this book? This project? 

Antoine:  This book, in fact, which is my second collaboration with  the publishing house "Autrement".  So, you said it. I had started collaborating with them at the moment  of « l'Atlas de la Culture ».  It was my first collaboration with them.  I really like this publishing house  because it specializes in the Atlases and I really wanted to  work with mapping,  with infographics  which is what I did for the "Atlas of Culture".  I felt like doing it again.  And therefore, to do it this time relation to the train.  This was for several reasons.

So, firstly for family reasons.  My father is passionate about trains  and he passed that passion on to me.  That is for sure. Thanks to the magazines, in those years… “La Vie du Rail”, that kind of thing. This magazine was  really very invested in the railway field. 

Then on the other hand,  I am a frequent train user.  And I was taking the train  for both the professional reasons…  As you have understood, I have two professional lives.  One is that of a musician, and another is  that of a journalist, or vice versa.  And so, whether it is for music tours  or for news reports, well…  I have done it very often by train.  Therefore, I know the train stations well  and I wanted to know more.  And I realized that  books about trains,  there were many beautiful books  about trains.  For example, highlighting  the beautiful locomotives  or even fairly technical books,  but on the other hand,  there were few books which showed,  let us say, aspects that were happening  behind the scenes. That is to say,  the geopolitical,  economic, societal issues related to railways  that we happen behind the curtain  and therefore,  I wanted to embark on this adventure.  Especially in a period  which was also somewhat that of,  not far from the health (Covid) crisis.  And this health crisis has shown…  It brought it back into the spotlight, obviously, the importance of the railway. While it also recalled, of course  the entire environmental dimension  that is behind it. And it is always necessary to remember it, of course compared to the financial aid  granted to the air transport or to the road.  And that the train feels,  obviously the dearth of this investment. Therefore, I wanted to give this adventure a try and to explore my luck… 

As you said, I did it jointly.  It is obviously a collaborative effort, a team effort with  Arthur BEAUBOIS-JUDE, who is a cartographer.  He works for the GEO magazine.  He worked for "Jeune Afrique" as well.  So, we had  that passion, the one that  we shared together. Really, the idea was to build this  “Geopolitics of Rail”,  indeed, in the form of an Atlas,  with different inputs,  each time with a text and a map  to really immerse oneself in these  train lines. 

Anubandh: Very good. That is very true because when I talked about this book to my colleagues  and myself including, I am in the field of railways for 15 years now,  and even myself,  I had not made that connection between the  rail and the geopolitics!  But when you think about it, actually, it is quite obvious.  So, I really enjoyed discovering it and learning new aspects.

By the way, there is a word  that you have used quite often  in this book. It is,  « Thuriféraire »!  ha ha ha and that means an "aficionado",  perhaps a railway enthusiast.  So, obviously you are a « Thuriféraire »! 

Antoine: There you go! Exactly! 

Anubandh: However, you also mentioned Jean CASTEX  who wrote the book« Le Train Jaune des Pyrénées »,  so we can say that this book  is a kind of a reference for France.  Moreover, there is also Joe BIDEN  who is known as "AMTRAK Joe",  to whom this title is also attributed. 

Then you talked about the relevance of the railway…  So, I would like to emphasize this before moving on.  What we see here is that there is a need to rebalance the market share  between the maritime transport  and the railway transport. Because 80% of the  world trade is done through maritime.  And on an average, the train is twice faster than the boat  and is at half the price of an air flight.  The railway benefits from a more dense and efficient network.  That is true for the merchandise transport  but this is also true for the  passenger transport.  And obviously, it is much less polluting,  if we exclude, of course, pollution linked  to the initial infrastructure and the land-use planning, than other means of transport. Therefore, that is important. 

I would like to ask you for a few thoughts…  because in the book, you also talked of several historical aspects.  That really struck and  fascinated me.  You mentioned the "Baghdad Bahn"  which linked the city of Baghdad to Berlin.  You mentioned Josip Broz TITO's "Blue Train".  Next, the train that Vladimir LENIN took  between Zurich and Moscow, before the revolution  in Russia of 1917. There was this dream by Cecil John RHODES, to link Cape Town to Cairo.

Thus, there is all that. On the other hand, what is not in the book, but it is also historical and relevant,  especially for the Indian audience  is that Mahatma GANDHI,  before beginning his political stint in India,  he was staying in South Africa.  And there, once, he was thrown out  or forced to get out  of a train carriage because he was not  in the right reserved class,  the class that was reserved for Indians  or for the Black people. And somewhere,  it was a turning point in his struggle. 

Another personal aspect and this is also  linked to GANDHI is that I,  I come from India and I come from the  center of the country where GANDHI spent  the last 15 years of his life, in Wardha.  It is a city that is located at the railways crossroads; North - South - East - West. And somewhere, that also helped made his political outings easier.

So, if you have any thoughts on these aspects,  historical figures who shaped  the perception of the railway. 

Antoine: Indeed. I think you have said something that is truly essential.  In fact, the train is very closely  linked to people, to personalities. That is to say, very often, railway affinity is a matter of  personal preference which  then drives certain policies. 

You gave this example of Jean CASTEX  who is now the head of the  SNCF (Société Nationale des Chemins de Fer français).  And who, when he was the Prime Minister of France, he promoted the railway redevelopment.  For example, the restarting of night trains in France.  It was with Emmanuel MACRON…  or the same Emmanuel MACRON,  when he was in the government of François HOLLANDE,  he had contributed to stopping of the  night train activity in France. So, the arrival on the scene  of a railway enthusiast like Jean CASTEX,  and especially who is well aware  of the long-term implications of a massive investment that  would represent for the rail sector  and its impact on the environmental, on the  society at large and on all the other aspects.  And so, there we were able to see that…  By the way, he was in the  Paris - Nice night train when it got reopened.  Therefore, that is really important to notice. 

AMTRAK Joe,  it is the same thing.  Joe BIDEN, a great train enthusiast who already,  when he was the vice-president of Barack OBAMA,  he had campaigned to  develop high speed railways  in the United States.  And then to develop the railway corridors  when he was himself the  President of the United States.  He had put this whole plan in place  to build a railway infrastructure.  Thus, very often, these are individual matters,  individual destinies that make emergence of the railway.  I think it is always  interesting  to remind that there is this question  of a certain affinity, of personal tropism. 

We also notice this in some historical anecdotes.  All the examples we had… and then you are right to recall all these Indian examples.  Because you know better than I do,  obviously, India is a fabulous country.  Anyone who has traveled to this country, very often, they do it by rail.  It is one of the best ways to understand  also the Indian culture and  I did not know the story of GANDHI,  but I find it absolutely fascinating. In any case,  it is a nice common point that you have with him. 

Anubandh: Absolutely!

And there is also an another  important role that the train plays.  It is about connecting people, nations, and it helps the  exchange of ideas.  And I think, it is an absolutely important role. 

However, you also spoke in this book about concepts like  geo-economy, geostrategic aspects and  geopolitics…  So, I would like...  although it may seem obvious, yet I would like you to explain to us  the differences or the interconnections  between these terms. 

Antoine: In fact, it really has to be said that the railway,  it actually concerns  these various geopolitical issues.  Because obviously, the  railway is at the heart of the tussles  between powers.  Just look at the role of the train  in the war in Ukraine.  I think that illustrates it so perfectly.  One can see there  how the railway  is used so  effectively.  Today, it is of major importance and priority.  Moreover, one of the major railway bridges  which connects Russia to Crimea,  was bombed  because it was a major  and a symbolic railway line.  Strategically, it was very important.  Thus, this is politics, this is geopolitics.  We can understand that. 

Now, Geo-economic is also directly related...  The same example.  The war in Ukraine.  The Ukrainian Railway  company is the country's largest employer  and especially for the transport of goods.  It is an essential link in the country's economy.  And then, obviously, when it is stopped or destroyed,  then it changes a lot of things. And on top of that,  there are the problems of railway gauge  which are not the same between  Europe and Ukraine  or between the different countries that were  within the Soviet sphere of influence  and so on…  We can really see how these  various problems are intertwined  to make train riding today  a central axis. This in fact  represents a lot  of global issues.  Thus even with seemingly  regional aspects,  we end up with  global issues.  You only have to look… very often, you are going to see a Chinese investment done in the case of the new Silk and Road  initiative and so on.  And you will understand  how a train line actually works.  In fact, it says something  about the state of the world. 

Anubandh: Yes. Thank you.

In this book, you have  talked about 25 train lines,  which are active or are planned and  which are located in some areas of geopolitical tension,  whether they are armed, commercial or migratory.  And these lines are spread in all the 5 continents.  You have chosen railway lines from each continent.  And what I propose is that we discuss a few examples, a few lines  from each of these continents. 

However, before that, I would also like to talk  from a technical perspective.  That is because when we talk about the railway sector,  it is not just the trains or the rolling stock,  it is also about  the signaling,  about the infrastructure,  about the operational aspects,  about the maintenance, etc. Therefore, there are many aspects  that work together. 

Antoine: Indeed Anubandh. 

As you said before, it is always necessary to repeat this  that the infrastructure is the key here.  In fact, when the railway,  when you have a railway problem,  most of the time…  Take the example of Germany for instance  which is really in a mess… there is chaos in the  railways sector over there.  This is truly a country that does not function well.  Almost half of the trains  do not arrive on time there.  In case of the main line connections, to infrastructure problems. In other words, if we do not invest  in the infrastructure,  it does not work!  This is truly something essential.  This is where public investment  in the railway is  really important  and that infrastructure is vital.

And you are right to say.  We often think of the beautiful locomotives,  the beautiful trains, about the most modern trains  and in fact perhaps, the essential link,  it is the rails itself and the ballast! 

Anubandh: Of course.

Yes, the example of Germany is important  because Germany has at least   Thus, they have to catch up now.  And that is what also causes abandoning of certain lines.  That is the reason, last year  the punctuality rate of German trains  was only 62%! 

Now, I suggest  that we begin  the different continents.  Thus, for me, the first continent is Europe.  And I am just going to read the main railway lines  you have considered. And here,  we will choose only two railway projects for our discussion. 

So, there is "Rail Baltica: Integration of the  Baltic countries into the European network.”  There is, "Eurostar facing Brexit",  "Austria, European hub for night trains",  "The train at the heart of the Balkan wars",  "Lyon-Turin: A risky marriage for you",  "Switzerland: A railway model?",  “France: Railcoop, the railway cooperative,” even if this project  has been stopped, and the "Russia" example you mentioned...  "The annexation of Crimea by train."  So, these are the projects. 

And I am really interested  in this Rail Baltica project.  I am going to read through some key ideas from this project,  from your book and  then I will invite you to comment.  Thus, Rail Baltica,  this is the integration of the Baltic countries  within the European network.  It is a railway line of 870 km  that will link  Poland to Finland,  across the Baltic countries, including Estonia,  Latvia and Lithuania. This railway line  is meant to reduce their dependence on Russia. 



 

However, in Russia,  there are doubts about this project  because they think that even if this project is  dedicated to passenger and freight transport,  the real objective of the project could be  to allow movement of  military equipment and troops  within NATO member countries.  Thus, that is the geopolitics at play.  However, the project was launched  or the first discussion was launched in 1994,  so that was even before  the integration of these countries,   It is perhaps necessary to  dig in deeper to verify if NATO  was also involved in this discussion of  their integration in the EU.  In 2014, there was a joint venture  between these three Baltic countries. 

In 2015, there was a feasibility study  of the Tallinn-Helsinki railway tunnel.  This proposed tunnel is of almost 85 km which is planned under the sea  between the two cities of Helsinki and Tallinn. The cost of this project is enormous.  The cost for this tunnel alone is around 20 billion Euros and your book was published in 2021.  Thus, these are the prices  of that era.  Today, we need to check what its current cost is.  The tunnel is approximately 85 km long and as  I told you, it is the longest underwater tunnel in the world.  The European Court of Auditors  had judged that this project was not viable. 

The inauguration of this project  was supposed to be this year, in 2026,  but ultimately it does not seem  to be happening before 2030. Then there is this  railway gauge difference that you were talking about  in these countries…  The track gauge is 1520 mm in these countries, as it is also in Russia. While in the rest of Europe, it is 1435 mm. Thus, this new line, it would be of this European standard. Apparently, the European Union (EU)  invested a lot of money in this project.  But, there is still a shortage of money.  And thus, it is China which came and invested there!  Therefore, we see all this geopolitics that is at play.  These are the key points for me. 

I now invite you to comment. 

Antoine: Indeed, Rail Baltica.

You really have to imagine that it is an  anti-Putin railway front  which is currently being carried out.  Well, in this case... The project has been discussed  and debated for a long time.  But now, since October 2025, the project is well  and truly underway.  The tracks have been laid out.  There are infrastructures that are being built,  railway terminals and so on.  The renovations of stations are being carried out,  so as to double the platforms, in order to accommodate  this entire new railway line.  As you said, that is the whole point.  It is obviously about having a line to tailored to European gauge,  in order to be able to connect  the three Baltic countries; Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania,  to the rest of the European Union (EU). 

Today, these countries,  their historical background links them to Russia  and of course, in the face of the Russian threat  and even more so since the war in Ukraine,  the three Baltic countries want to be able to get closer  to the rest of the Europe in terms of transport of passengers,  and of course also for goods.  Because, this is really on an axis,  at the heart of eastern and western Europe.  Thus, in logistics, this is obviously very important. In particular, there is an intermodal terminal in Kaunas  which is a very important infrastructure  for the fret but also for the  military transport. 

Besides,  it is officially confirmed that  NATO is a stakeholder in this project,  to such an extent that, for example,  the platforms of train stations are designed  to be able to accommodate military convoys.  Thus, the construction  is being done in consultation with NATO.  The funding, the major part of it is obviously  provided by the European Union (EU),  and also by different countries.  Thus, there is a structure which was created,  which brings together these three countries.  The headquarter is in Riga, Estonia.  And so, right now,  this project through the Baltic countries,  it is definitely launched.  The construction site is in full swing. The opening of the line is planned in 2030. 

The only important question  that remains is for the tunnel  which is  an absolutely incredible project in itself.  This would be the longest underwater tunnel in the world  and it was supposed to be part of the  new Chinese silk roads.  Thus, obviously, the war in Ukraine has changed things somewhat.  It is complicated for Xi JINPING's China to form alliances  directly with the Baltic countries.  In addition, also some Baltic countries  recognize Taiwan. Thus, this project,  which is as well backed by a local Estonian entrepreneur,  for the moment is  under quite some scrutiny.  But, in any case, it would be the logical next step  to be able to connect Rail Baltica to Finland via this tunnel.  However, even without the underwater tunnel,  this project remains impressive.

And you said it. The cost is really much more than this one. It must be today around 25 billion Euros.  So, indeed, because it is a real  engineering challenge with  the skepticism of the  Russian-speaking communities  who see this project as a purely  pro-western project.  And also the opposition from some  environmentalists,  because, indeed, this line passes  through numerous natural reserves.  Therefore, this is a project that is generating a lot of debate and which alone concentrates many issues  which we mentioned in the introduction. 

Anubandh: Of course. For me, this project has everything! 

And besides, there are quite a few  French companies such as Alstom, Systra, and Eiffage…  that are interested in it. 

Antoine: Yes, they are definitely on the construction site.  That is clear. 

Anubandh: Very good.

Now, we will move on to our second project. 

These are the night trains which you have already mentioned briefly earlier. 


 

And for me, it was really something very fascinating.  We already talked about this  at the beginning regarding  what happened in France in this matter.  You say that in France in the year 2000,  there were 67 lines  of night trains.  And in 2020, out of these only two remained.  And of course, it was in 2016 that the real halt came.  This decision had been made  by the “MACRON law”,  in order to promote the private,  "MACRON buses". 

However, this situation is not only specific to France.  Apparently, that is how it happened  pretty much everywhere in Europe,  including in Germany, which has also stopped  its night trains the same year.  And there was also the privatization process. 

However, there was one country,  and it was Austria that decided  to do things differently.  The geography of Austria, going from  West to East, facilitates this format of the  night time hours.  Its geographical location  is at the very heart of Europe.  Thus, it decided to bet on that  and every year since 2016,  Austria opens a new line,  an additional night train line.  For example, it had Vienna – Berlin,  Salzburg – Venice, Hamburg – Zurich.  These are international night train lines  with Vienna as a hub.  Since then, the number of travelers has doubled  and the night train business is  generating profit since 2019.  Passengers enjoy or they prefer this mode  of transport because it is environmental friendly  and is also practical and economical.  It also saves you a night in a hotel. How did the company OBB (Österreichische Bundesbahnen) made this turn around?  Initially, it bought some old Deutsche Bahn rolling stocks.  It renovated it at first, but then OBB placed  a new order of 250,000 euros  to Siemens to buy  new railway night train coaches. 

Antoine: It is indeed a gamble. It was still successful, though.  What did Austria do differently  which at that moment, when all other countries  were exiting the  night trains?  Austria said, no!  They said, we are going to bet on it.  And we are going to make Austria a central point in Europe for these  night train services. Thus, of course,  operating the night train is complicated.  It is obviously expensive  to run trains at night,  for questions such as  border crossing personnel. It makes things quite complex.  On international railway routes, on board a night train you have fewer passengers than in a daytime train.  Above all, a daytime train  you can make it run without stopping,  making lot of business.  A night train, obviously,  will only be used once. It will have to wait  to leave again the following night. Thus, there really are  many reasons that make it economically quite complex. 

But, that does not change the fact that today,  we are seeing some real success in this area.  Thus, why are we seeing success?  because there is a real demand.  Very clearly, there are  customers,  travelers who  want to take the night train  for many different reasons.  When you board a night train,  you will also have young people  who want to take it for somewhat  economical reasons, because indeed  a night train avoids the need for a hotel night.  For ecological reasons, of course.  A train is obviously  much better than flying.  You have elderly people who want to avoid  going to airports, spending hours  at security checks.  You are going to have…  quite a different type of people  in the  night trains.  And in any case, they are often full.  Their occupancy rate, it really shows that there is a very, very strong demand  about that. 

So yes, it requires resources.  It is such a shame that France has not invested  a little money to allow  the Paris – Vienna night train  to continue.  Because, it involves a lot of partnerships.  And OBB said that the Paris-Vienna  night train would be kept functional only if,  of course, if this partnership is  continued with France. And the later chose not  to continue it anymore. And neither does the Paris-Berlin route is functional anymore.  However, this contract was taken over by a cooperative. 

And a little word about this cooperative  because there is a lot of talk about OBB,  from the public company perspective. However, there is a private actor  which managed to get by on the night train.  And that is quite a challenge  when you see all the expensive investments.  It is the « European Sleeper »  which is a Dutch cooperative  and which notably launched  a Brussels - Amsterdam - Prague route  that takes over the Paris-Berlin route.  In particular, their business model works  because they are in the rental business  of equipments and not of purchase.  It is a different economic model  because other actors have failed.  For instance, "Midnight Trains".  This start-up which wanted to make  somewhat luxurious night trains.  They did not succeed.  Thus, it is a complicated business model.  However, today, there is a real demand.  And the proof is in European Sleeper on the private side or OBB, on the public side.  It is a proof that it can work very well. 

Anubandh: Super! 

We talked a little bit about India  and I would also like to say that in India,  I do not know if you know this or not.  but all the trains are night trains!  There are no dedicated night trains.  There are some trains which do not have  sleeper coaches  but practically all the trains,  perhaps 90% of the trains have sleeper berths.  That is because the distances are very long  and the trains travel slower than in Europe.  Thus, it easily makes up for a 7-8 hour of a journey, even if the distances are not huge.

And that is why  I sometimes think to myself that in France,  even on this Paris-Lyon section,  the TGV is going so fast.  But at night, if we drove slower,  we can run a night train. 

Antoine: Of course, of course, exactly! 

In any case, I think there is  a genuine demand and personally,  I am a great lover of night trains.  Thus, I did a lot of these lines and I invite the audience  who are listening to us  to do the same.  Because, it is always an adventure.  It is incredible to meet people on the train  that use this mode of transport.  It is one of the best ways  to understand a country, certainly  much better than through a duty-free shop  of an airport area. 

Anubandh: Absolutely!

Okay, we have been talking about India, so let us go to India! Now, this is the Asia continent.  But in this continent,  you took the example of the  « Samjhauta Express :  Friendship at the heart of the Indo-Pakistani conflict"  "The new Silk Road railways, the  Belt and Road Initiative”  “China – Japan: The High-Speed Rail War”  “Beijing – Lhasa: the assimilation policy  of China goes via the rail.",  "North Korea: The Dictatorship of the Rails.",  Okay, before we talk about the example of India,  I would also like to refer  to this historical background  between India and Pakistan.  As you know,  in 1947,  these two countries separated.  And that separation was quite  bloody and painful.  There were over 14 million displaced people and  between 3 - 5 million deaths.  Anyway, these are rough estimates.  So, one has to be careful with these estimates,  but still it is within these ranges.  During that period, there were trains  full of people murdered, killed  who arrived at their destinations in  both directions.  There is a famous a novel,  named “Train to Pakistan”,  by Khushwant SINGH  which tells us the story of that era.  But to talk about Samjhota Express, the word Samjhota in Hindi means a contract  or a compromise.  Thus, that is the Samjhota between the two countries.  This train connects Delhi to Lahore  and then of course, there is this geopolitical tension  between these two countries.  Since 2019, there was the  loss of Kashmir's autonomy and ever since, Kashmir was  placed under the direct tutelage of New Delhi. 




Since then, this line has been suspended and stopped. However, this line  was launched in 1976,  following the Shimla agreement.  which had marked the end of the  Indo-Pakistani war of 1971,  related to the liberation of Bangladesh.  It is only a 50 km of railway link.  At first, the service  was daily and then,  from 1994 onwards,  its frequency was reduced   to twice a week.  At the beginning, the train was up to Amritsar,  but after that, there was this connection  between Amritsar and New Delhi,  which was also created very quickly.  This railway line is a cooperation between Pakistani railways and  Indian Railways (IR). The locomotives  and the wagons of the two companies  are alternated every 6 months.  In fact, since this service was discontinued in 2019,  India is putting pressure on Pakistan  so that Pakistan returns the  Indian locomotives and wagons,  that are stuck in Pakistan! 

And it is thanks to you that I learnt about one more interesting rail link!  So, there is not only this rail connection  but since 2006 and until 2019,  we also had another link  between India and Pakistan,  Jodhpur – Karachi, that is the Thar Express.  Thar being the desert in Rajasthan. So, that is great! Because you know,  given the tensions between Pakistan and India,  information does not flow easily between these two countries.  There are many things we do not know about each other.  And that is a real shame.  It is thanks to you, thanks to this book,  that I learnt existence  of this line. 

Antoine: But indeed, here we have the illustration regarding what you were saying in  the introduction that the train can connect people.  It can connect ideals and can link values.  And this idea that when precisely,  obviously when you have some tensions  between two states, between ethnic groups,  between religions, for varied reasons,  then the train could really be there  like a cord so as to get  as close as possible.  But that is why, when talking about India,  because obviously,  India is a country of trains  and as I said, there is a huge  number of railway lines that we take there,  especially many tourists.  We know that India attracts a lot of  French tourists as well. However, I wanted  to leave aside the tourist destinations  and I wished to show this dimension of  direct geopolitics  between India and Pakistan,  knowing well that with the nationalist politics  led by Narendra MODI  obviously,  these tensions were rather  becoming exasperated. And also seeing the extremely tense situation in Pakistan.

Thus, unfortunately we were in  something where for now,  these rail links are closed.  Thus, obviously we have to hope  that they can function again one day  and that the convoys can pass again.   Because, the railway  directly echoes  the turbulences of the world.  Thus, it is certain that when the rail link  will work again this border crossing  will be highly symbolic.  Therefore, here we have directly,  this illustration of  the railway as being the  echo chamber of  global tensions.  Now, let us hope that  these lines may one day reopen. 

Thank you.

Anubandh: Now, let us visit the neighbor of India, that is China. 

 



China who is spreading out  its network or its ambition  into the world.  Thus, this is the project named  “Belt and Road Initiative”.  It is a huge project  which wishes to  touch two-thirds  of the world's population.  And it is a project with an enormous cost of  over 8000 billions of dollars.  This project links,  connects China  with Central Asia, Europe  but also with Africa and America.  There are several possibilities and  China is not targeting just one of them.  China wants to have several possibilities  so as not to depend on a single  country like Russia, for instance.  Especially for connections to Europe,  there is the merchandise that comes  from China to Europe  but also in the other direction.  Some dairy products or French wine or  others are leaving towards China, but it is much less.  It is more in the direction of China to Europe and thanks to that, China has become the first trading partner with the European Union (EU). 

Antoine: What you are saying is absolutely right. 

And it is really necessary to accurately assess China's evolution on  the railway plan because of this development.  It was spectacular.  You have to imagine this at different levels. Already on the internal level  when you see its high-speed network,  the evolution it has undergone  is absolutely incredible.  Initially, they took a little bit of advice  from Alstom and so on,  to launch their high speed trains.  And today, it is very clear that their state railway company (CRRC) is the world leader.  And we see it in different ways.  How much is China really investing in the railways?  So, China is investing at the internal level  by developing its high speed railway network,  in particular to cope with the fact that,  quite simply since the airline corridors inside  China are saturated.  Thus, the population needs to be transported somehow.  And as you know, right now, I believe, if I am not mistaken, the world's most populated country is India.  However, China is not far away.  And so, faced with this population,  which needs to be transported,  to uplift them from the middle classes.  And all of this contributes to the development of the railway. 

Nevertheless, there is another goal.  There is also an obviously political aim,  in particular that of control  on the minorities. And I am thinking  in particular of the Ouïghour minority.  There is also the Tibetan minority.  And this control by the majority ethnic group, the Hans,  this ethnic group which is in majority in China,  it is also done by the rail.  For instance, when China embarks on  this completely crazy project  in terms of engineering, and launches  this railway line to Lhasa,  well, then there is obviously  a goal of seizing power,  simply to make it easy for the Hans  to go to Tibet,  making the ethnic group  of Tibetans a minority  and to make them  less and less important.  The same applies to the Ouïghour. 

And finally, the third aspect about China in its railway investment,  in its railway policy, it is this idea  of setting out to conquer the world  by developing trade.  And therefore, through these  new silk roads  or “Belt and Road Initiative”,  depending on the name we want to give it.  In any case, this idea,  it is truly essential  in order to understand today  where is China headed.  This is a project that was launched by Xi JINPING  who had to face,  certain moments of economic crisis in China,  some ups and downs.  But the fact remains that today,  China has built its transport corridors.  Thus, maritime, it involves a lot of the  maritime transport but also rail transport. 

The train occupies an important place and we can see it  in the map that you are showing Anubandh.  This is an excerpt from the book.  So, all these maps  are created by  Arthur BEAUBOIS-JUDE.  In this map,  we can clearly see how China  connects to Europe,  in different ways, in order to avoid  being too dependent on any one country.  China indeed has put in place  these  different corridors and  the situation is that, we can see  Chinese trains arriving in freight stations in Europe,  in Dortmund or elsewhere.  They are filled with goods  and when they leave,  I can tell you that they are leaving back  not with too many things from Europe.  We can really see the trade balance.  It is very clear and  when this train departs again,  there will be a few bottles  of Bordeaux wine, a few other products,  but nothing compared  to all electronic and other products  shipped via China, through this rail link.  And we will find it again, these new Silk roads,  they go all over the world. 

So much so that China  is even funding a rail link project  across South America  to build a bi-oceanic train,  from the Pacific to the Atlantic.  This is because they want easy access  to the wealth of South America,  particularly soyabean, for instance.  But also steel and  different minerals which  allowed it afterwards  to create railway and maritime corridors.  And also to be able to develop  at the  commercial level.  Thus, we can clearly see that China's railways policy is working at different levels;  at geopolitical levels,  at economic levels,  at truly ethnic levels.

There are really different interpretations of its railway investment. 

Anubandh: Thank you, Antoine! 

You mentioned Lhasa…  We do not have much time but I am still tempted  to present this line.



 

I am not going to go into too much detail here.  I would still say that what I really appreciated here  is the fact that there are sections  that go up to  over 5000 meters of altitude  and that people take this train  to go from Beijing to Lhasa.  Instead of taking a plane from Beijing, people prefer to take the train in order to  gradually get used to  the high altitude.  On the train, there is even oxygen for  each passenger, there is a doctor.  For instance, a few days ago in Paris  it snowed and the whole Parisian  railway network was impacted.  And now, it seems to me that this Beijing - Lhasa  railway line exists at least since 2014 – 2015.  And perhaps, it is the highest railway line in the world.  In any case, it is very impressive.  If you have a few words regarding this rail link. 

Antoine: It must also be said that the project  is now looking to extend the stretch to Nepal  and as far as Kathmandu. Tthere is also a kind  of railway competition taking place there,  which is playing out between India and China,  across the Himalayas.  And India does not want to let China  dominate all the countries  of the Himalayan region. So, you see here again,  these geopolitical issues.  Thus, it is a rail line that I unfortunately have not taken yet. However, I believe that starting from Beijing,  to go to Lhasa, it must be  a rather striking experience. 

Anubandh: Yes, perhaps you did not take that trip  because you wrote in the book  that access to journalists is forbidden ! 

Antoine: That it is, exactly! 

Anubandh: Okay. Good.

We will also quickly visit this competition of high speed trains between  China and Japan.  Because in a very short span of time  China now has built over 45,000 km  of high speed railway network.  Thus, it is the largest network in the world.  I believe, for France, it is less than 3,000 km  of high speed network. And more than 80% of this  global high speed rail network is now in China,  And China, like Japan…  Japan, which is another giant  in this sector,  are looking to export their solution.  So far, there are two markets that they have won each.  That they have managed to conquer.  For Japan, it is India. It is the railway project between  the city of Ahmedabad and Mumbai.  The railway line has not yet been completed.  And there are many years of delay. On the other hand, there is one high speed railway project in Taiwan for Japan.  Now Taiwan, which is  China's enemy.  And then there is China, which has successfully completed  rail projects in Thailand and in Indonesia. 

Thus, if you have any thoughts on this rail competition  between these two Asian giants. 

Antoine: Yes, because Japan is the historical player,  with their high speed train, the Shinkansen.  With this historical development of high speed train,  it is a truly a unique model in Japan.  Also, these are private companies  whose the economic model relies  heavily on stations and infrastructure.  Linked to these train stations are  cities with hotels,  offices,  shops and so on.  And that is what brings in the money,  a lot of money to the train companies  and which allows it to exploit  their train infrastructure.  On the other hand, obviously, there is China.  It is a more recent actor, but one  that has grown up very quickly.  At first, we said yes, China  is a bit like the “low cost”  of the high speed train.  Precisely, as these trains can have safety problems.  There was, in particular,  a major accident with their  high speed railway.  But since then, that is no longer the case.  And indeed, the competition  is also becoming technological.  In these high speed trains section,  with the fastest speeds are now the  electromagnetic trains, and so on.  So, there is this real technological competition.  But it is certain that today China’s  share in the  global rail market  is increasing considerably. 

As you noted, Anubandh,  these are the countries  where, in particularly,  countries like Taiwan  that are not going to entrust to China  the construction of its high-speed rail line.  Thus, Japan can count on  Beijing's enemies. 

Anubandh: Perfect. Thanks.

We are now going to change continents.  We are going to America now.  And here I am just going to quote the railway lines  that you have dealt with on this continent.  First is called, "North America: A Cross-Border Network",  “Canada: The First Nations Train”,  "United States: High-speed rail network revived by Joe BIDEN",  “Central America: ‘La Bestia’, the migrant train.”  It is the train of death.  Next, “Latin America: the bi-oceanic corridor”,  that has witnessed the  geopolitical turbulence. 

And what I would like to talk about here  is the railway line in Canada,  "Canada: The First Nations Train." 



 

And within it, there is also   an historical aspect. This line connects the seven islands.  In this area, there are these seven islands.  It connects the Schefferville area  to an another island.  And now, this line belongs to  the very first company “Tshiuetin”,  run and owned by the indigenous people.  It is a difficult word to pronounce.  It is a railway company  owned by the indigenous people.  Its modernization is meant to improve  the access to these communities but also to facilitate  the transport of ores and minerals.  Thus, this area is full of minerals.  But before that, we need to explore a bit of history.  In Canada, the situation of the indigenous populations is politically a very sensitive subject.  In the years 2019 or around this period, there was a discovery  of several hundred children's bodies,  near the residences of the native people,  and these residences existed  in the country between   and 1996.  And that is seen as a proof  "of racism,  of discrimination and of systemic injustice”.   These are the words  of the Canadian Prime Minister Justin TRUDEAU.  And it is expected that Canada must learn  lessons from the past. And it is in this spirit,  with this recognition of the genocide, and with this  conclusion that is defended by the commission of inquiry,  that Canada wants to act. 

They want to improve  the living conditions of these communities.  And there is also an Indian aspect to it.  That is because  the mining activity  has witnessed a certain rebirth in this region,  since the price of iron has increased recently.  And the Indian industry giant "Tata Steel"  is also active in this region. 

Antoine: In fact, the railway lines  tell us the story of the worst  and the best of humanity.  The worst part is that very often these  railway lines were built  under the worst conditions.  It is important to remember this because  many of the lines we are talking about,  which are old, which were built  in the 19th century, and those that were  later renovated and so on,  with their construction in the 19th century,  during the colonial times and all…  Very often, in a large number of cases,  we will find it in Sub-Saharan Africa, in Asia,  and so on. These railway lines were built under the worst conditions,  that is to say, with the exploitation of the  local populations and with  an astounding number of deaths.  Because obviously, although the construction  of these lines, very often, constitutes remarkable  engineering feats. However,  usually the work was being done  without the minimum safety conditions. And therefore,  ultimately resulting in the terrifying outcomes.  Thus, when we are riding on these railway lines, we should spare a thought  to those who had lost their lives  while building these lines. 

And today, what better symbol could be there  than to see that in Canada,  that a railway line exists today,  to be able go to these territories,  some of which are a little hostile  in terms of their landscape,  due to weather conditions, therefore these can  also be quite complicated to exploit.  Thus, these lines are now  managed by indigenous communities  that were isolated in Canada for so long.  And today,  fortunately,  it has been a few years now,  including the tenure of Justin TRUDEAU,  when he was in power, he had  launched this initiative.  Speaking of acts of cultural genocide  of the First Nations,  instead of the outright  use of the word "genocide",  which would have entailed other  legal impacts.  But in any case, in this context of the  recognition of the cultural genocide,  today we can witness in the population  of Canada a certain  willingness to try and support  in best possible ways, people of these  indigenous communities who have  suffered so much.  And so to see the re-appropriation  of this railway line, with all the  financial context  which is also very important and thus  one can feel happy about.  And it shows that, well, not everything is  necessarily doomed and  thanks to the renewed railway  lines one can witness a change in the situation. 

Anubandh: Thank you.

We will go now to  the United States and there the train,  it is not like in Europe, or at least,  not for the passenger transport.  However, the rail network there for freight,  for the merchandise is quite developed.  And in this railway project  you are talking about the  “North America: A cross-border network”.  It is between the United States, Canada  and Mexico.  And this line crosses the United States.  Moreover, there was a treaty of  free trade which was signed  in 2020  between these countries.  And the company, "Canadian Pacific"  bought in 2021 the American company  "Kansas City Southern"  and it developed  this crucial rail axis  between the United States and the Mexico. 




Thus, it is also worth noting that this is happening  in a country where AMTRAK, which is the public sector company  and which manages primarily the passenger traffic,  while the rest of the freight network is private.  And so, the other companies in the United States, they were not very reassured with the construction of this   transnational railway line. This is a project that is also meant to facilitate the automotive industry located in this area. 

If you have any comments about this project. 

Antoine: Yes, because that is the whole paradox.  In other words, the United States is very bad in terms of  passengers transport. And yet, historically,  it was a country that had been  pioneer in railways  because the conquest  from the United States, in particular  the conquest of the West, it was done by the rail,  in particular,  with a huge number of private companies.  And then each company  had its own rail gauge.  It was very complicated and it did not help  for the country's integration. But in any case,  this conquest of the West happened  thanks to the railway. Thus, in the past,  there was an extremely dense rail network.  But unfortunately, as the United States then promoted  the development of the automobile or the aeronautics industry,  the passenger train traffic  had been then completely sidelined,  with very little public investment.  Once again, the train is a sovereign domain and therefore  the national company AMTRAK  survived and survives, as best it can. 

And as we talked about it, at the very beginning  of our conversation, it had to be  thanks to the arrival of Joe BIDEN on the scene.  First of all, as the vice president under Barack OBAMA,  and then outright  at the White House as the President and who then  relaunched an infrastructure plan  to enable AMTRAK to build again.  But we are obviously very far away,  even if there was  a renewed engagement with Pete BUTTIGIEG  in particular who was a  very important democrat personality  and who was the Minister of Transport. 

However, there was also this geopolitical idea  to revive  United States Railway policy  in competition with China,  by seeing obviously  how China developed on this terrain.  Nevertheless, it is not easy to make up  for such a delay. That is certain.  And all these projects take time,  including the high-speed rail project in California.  However, what you see  in this map  is that the freight traffic  works very well  and for various reasons.  This is a territory that lends itself to  freight transport much more easily,  compared to the one in Europe  where the freight traffic  has been experiencing many difficulties  with a few exceptions, notably Switzerland  or others who have managed to find some working models. But here in the USA we can indeed see  these enormous distances and  the impressive traffic of these  enormous convoys, you really to have to  see them to cross  the United States  with these huge companies, and  these mergers you were talking about.  These are also to be considered  as a link between the United States,  Canada  and Mexico.  Obviously, from an economic point of view  but it is also necessary  to have this thought a little broader  from a geographical point of view,  to truly understand  this North American rail   freight traffic. In any case, for once  this could be a model  for Europe. 

Anubandh: Yes, but is that still the case under TRUMP?  Do you know if there is any change in politics now or of  direction? 

Antoine: Well, what is certain is that TRUMP… I do not  think that TRUMP has a strong affinity for railways.  In any case, unlike Joe BIDEN, TRUMP wants to put in very, very little public money  to develop this type of infrastructure,  and that is where  obviously the whole issue is.  Thus, as indeed,  for passenger transport,   unfortunately the period and efforts during Joe BIDEN’s stint must be considered as an exception  of this very brief, ultra-Atlantic railway boom. 

Anubandh: Okay. Thank you.

We do not have much  time left but I still wish  that we visit at least a few lines  from Africa and the Middle East. 

In Africa,  you have dealt with the line “Tanzara: Pioneer of China-Africa”,  "West Africa:  Vincent BOLLORE's dream of a railway loop.”  “Mauritania: the train  from the desert to a war zone",  "South Africa: Social inequality under the railways." 

So, I am interested and  I learnt a lot of new things  with this railway line "the Tanzara:  China-Africa pioneer” and especially regarding  the role that China played at that time.  Because this railway line was inaugurated in 1976.  Thus, this refers to countries  Zombiaand Tanzania.  And that is the line you were talking about.  The story of this project is  fascinating  because in Zombie,  there are many minerals. In order to transport them  maritime ports were needed and also the links to these ports.  However, these links were refused  by Zimbabwe of Rhodes  and so Zombia had no choice left  and it had to develop this railway link  via Tanzania.  But to create this railway line money was lacking.  Western countries refused to help.  Thus, it was MAO's China  who helped Zambia at that time,  not only by giving enormous bank credit for 30 years,  without any interest but also  by sending its engineers and technicians  who worked with the  people from Africa over there.  They built this immense project.  And at that time, you emphasized  that China was poorer  than the African countries. 




Thus, it also shows how important this project was for them. 

If you have anything else to add. 

Antoine: So, the Tanzara is a railway line  that I took and which is  absolutely fantastic.  As it is,  this railway line  is the very first  Chinese project in Africa. 

So, you board here the  Chinese wagons,  with Chinese instructions and all that.  Therefore, China's presence in Africa  is clearly visible and you go through this whole line  which is obviously incredible.  When you arrive, in particular  on the border between Tanzania and Zombia,  You have this hilly landscape which is  absolutely beautiful.  You are really…  It is also a very important  passenger connection. It is not just for freight transport.  And so you will arrive at Kapiri Mposhi.  It is not very far.  It is about an hour, I think, by car…  May be one or two hours by car from Lusaka, the capital  of Zambia and eventually you find yourself in… 

In exactly the kind of that idea that you mentioned Anubandh,  about this grand project by Cecil Rhodes,  whereas it was a very colonial project.  Let us remember that, of course,  It was about to go from Cape Town to Cairo by train,  in order to extend his political power,  by traversing the whole of Africa.  The dream has not been fully realized.  However, if we cannot go from North to South,  one can go from East to West.  In fact, today,  and in particular by linking… You can see it here.  If we go back a little through the Congo  and you join there another railway line,  also funded by China,  and that is why it is in red  on the map in Angola.  Then you will arrive in Lobito  and you will be able to travel from east to west. 

Moreover, even some tourist companies  have launched special offers,  paired  with safaris and  that kind of thing.  But you can also take the train  separately and  it is much better with the local population.  The conditions are sometimes a bit rough though.  But really, you have a crazy immersion, all the crazy memories, conversations…  Really, You get the  feel of the country.  There is no better way  to understand the culture  of this region. And thus,  you can cross from East to West,  Sub-Saharan Africa by train. 

Anubandh: Absolutely! It makes me want to Go for it!

Now, quickly, if you also have a few words to say  on this railway loop where Vincent BOLLORE was involved.  But I learned that he sold his holdings.  You explained that in one of your interviews. 

So, there you go, if you also have  a few words to say to us. 

 



Antoine: Well, it was Vincent BOLLORÉ,  the French businessman today,  and better  known for being at the head of  the far-right media,  like C News or Europe 1.  But sometimes what we tend to forget  is the fact that originally, he was an industrialist  who made his fortunes.  Above all and besides, if today he is involved in the media  it is because he managed to sell  his assets at high prices  and particularly in the field of logistics.  And this area of logistics,  this was notably in the  sub-Saharan Africa where he controlled  a large number of ports and railway lines.  And he had a dream,  which was to build  a railway loop  with this idea of always connecting  the hinterland to the ports. It is obviously always the same pattern to  bring the mineral riches to the sea  and then load them into the  maritime commerce.  And thus he created this loop, from Abidjan to Cotonou passing through Burkina Faso and Niger.  Few parts of this line were already  existing but it was necessary to build sections to connect the whole network.  That is what he did. He went for it.  Even before having completely secured the  government authorizations  and everything.  That is something we can notice as being  a bit postcolonial.  And so, he built about a hundred kilometers of track.  What I show on the map here is between  Niamey and Dosso in Nigeria, these are lines  which are now completely abandoned.  It is a kind of train, a ghost train since the loop has never been completed,  especially because the local governments,  the concerned countries  did not want to get involved  in this adventure of this railway loop  where China is entrusted  part of their network.  And I think Vincent BOLLORE retained  a great deal of bitterness out of this experience.  It was his dream. He had invested enormous resources there.  He was ready to invest personally in this  project.

We find this project somewhat similar  to the one that you mentioned of Rhodes. Of wanting to link  Cape Town to Cairo through a railway loop.  And through this rail adventure,  something that speaks  also sometimes of the megalomania  of certain individuals.  In any case, this project does not exist.  He sold it. So, all these assets  are now with the company MSC  who manages it  but does not wish to restart  all that was part of the original grand  railway loop project. 

Anubandh: Yes, and just one thing you also wrote  regarding this territory here in red,  that it is now invested by China. 

Antoine: Yes, so I was there not too long ago.  For now, not much is happening.  Indeed, there are discussions  but you know, the situation  remains complicated.  Benin is quite an unstable country  in that region.  Not too long ago, there was even  an attempted coup d'état. There is a lot of instability in the North of the country  where one must cross  the train line. 

So, yes.  There was this question  regarding the arrival of China.  However, given the instability, for the time being,  it is suspended. 

Anubandh: I would also like to emphasize here  the difference between private investment companies,  especially the European or the American ones  and the Chinese state. Because what concerns CRRC,  it is an investment  coming directly from the Chinese state.  Thus, there is also a difference  of the State's approach  and that of the private investment. 

Now,  we are going to visit the last railway project,  the last continent.  That is the Middle East. 

And this particular railway line is  with a "crazy beauty",  that is what you mentioned in the book!  But before I go there, I am just going to emphasize  a few other lines that you have dealt with  in this chapter.  So, there is this "Transasia:  in the face of the fragile truce between Turkey and Iran."  And we are very much talking about this region these days.  Then there is the  "Hejaz Train: From the Ottomans to Bashar al-Assad"  and “Dubai - Abu Dhabi: the train of the future, hyperloop”.  Now, this is the Transasia rail link.  It is a line that connects  Istanbul to Tehran,  between Turkey and Iran.  But today, apparently,  it is functional only between Ankara and Tehran. 



 

That is because a high speed line was built between  Istanbul and Ankara. This whole project  is of 2400 km,  and the total travel time is 57 hours.  And it is a journey of breathtaking beauty,  as you wrote. You will tell us more.  And then there is Iran.  For the Iranians, Turkey is the only country,  it is among the only countries, rare countries  where Iranians do not need a permit, where they do not need a visa.  This journey is divided into three parts.  The first part is in Turkey.  Then there is a passage  through this Lake of Van where there is a ferry  and the passengers pass through an area,  at an altitude of 4000 meters,  which is surrounded by hills.  And the very last leg of the journey is to Iran. And then, it goes all the way to Pakistan  for the merchandise.  In this area,  there are Kurds who are not  not much appreciated and loved by  Turkey.  Thus, there are often tensions there.  And it seems to me that, given the tensions.  this railway line is no longer in operation today.

Antoine: Unfortunately, it is exactly like the case of this railway line we were talking about, Samjhauta Express between India and Pakistan.  That is obviously  due to the geopolitical tensions,  the line is at a standstill.  I was lucky enough to ride it, to go from Ankara to Tabriz in Iran,  which was an  Incredible experience.  That was when the President Hassan ROUHANI was in office,  who was in charge in Iran.  So, it was a period of relative calm  that allowed the  smooth functioning of this  railway line for a while.  What was crazy was seeing  this Iranian community.  As you said, it is one of those rare possibilities  for them to go out, is to go to Turkey.  Thus, we see all these Iranians,  especially on the train and then  on this absolutely incredible ferry,  extremely rusty that I had taken  on the Lake of Van where there are  also some very big cats.  Lake of Van is known for its very big cats in Turkey. 

And there is this big ferry  which was crossing at night.  And there we saw all these Iranians drinking,  who were listening to music.  They enjoyed on the boat, briefly, a kind of an idyllic life, that is obviously far removed from the climate  of oppression in which they lived.  I am also thinking in particular  of Iranian women who were there, …  much freer,  much more than they  were in Iran.  However, Recep Tayyip ERDOGAN's Turkey  is not the  most progressive country either.  But that does not change the fact that there was,  and we could feel that sense of freedom.  Thus, the Iranian population enjoyed  before crossing the border again  and to go back to  their home.  This line is also incredibly beautiful  because it crosses the country, Cappadocia.  This is what I was talking about. These very high mountains  and we pass throughout this area that has a strong Kurdish dominance.  This, in fact, explains why this railway line  was very tense. And then we arrived in Tabriz.  In this area where there is a predominantly Azerbaijani community.  We are not very far from Azerbaijan.  It is the Azerbaijani community that lives there.  And then afterwards, you can continue. 

Moreover, in Iran,  there are a huge number of railway lines.  We can go as far as  near the Strait of Hormuz,   to the Bandar Abbas by train.  Thus, this is a country today  which is witnessing  an absolutely dramatic situation.  And we think a lot about it. My concern goes to the Iranian population.  But it is also a country  that deserves to be discovered by train. 

Anubandh: That was fascinating! Thank you. 

So, here is another railway line that I would like to take one day, when it will be in operation again.  Thank you so much! 

We are now coming to the end of this interview.  I have a few final comments.  So, once again, thank you for  having written this book!  Especially for all these fascinating projects, for all these railway lines that I did not know before,  the ones that I was unaware of. 

However, there is one small, a somewhat technical aspect that I have noted while reading your book.  In the book you often talk about the  number of passengers per year and the tonnage  or the tons of goods transported per year.  However, in the technical jargon,  since we do not know how many kilometers have been  actually traveled by these passengers or the freight,  we multiply it by the kilometers travelled.  So, it becomes, for example, if there are 10 passengers traveling 1 km,  then that becomes 10 passenger kilometers.  And if it is 10 tons of goods that traveled 10km, then that makes it 100 tonne-kilometres. There you go! 

Antoine: Ah… that is interesting! 

Anubandh: Thus, it just adds a sort of  Quantification. That is per kilometer travelled by the tonnage  or the passengers.

Antoine: Thank you! 

Anubandh: My pleasure! 

And I would like to conclude  this discussion now  with this warning about the environmental issue  that you raised. 

So, all of this is great to have rail links around the world,  but there is this race to build the rails,  there are all the new rail lines  that are being constructed,  there are these gigantic infrastructures that are built.  Thus, there is a risk where you say  that all of this can violently affect  our environment.  Therefore, the environmental argument which  is in favour of the renewal of the railway, could it also be  considered as being one of greenwashing in some way?  And with hidden geopolitical and geo-economic agenda? 

So, as a passenger, citizen  what should we keep in mind when we read this or when we hear such arguments? 

Antoine: You are absolutely right because it is necessary to be  wary of the environmental argument.  Of course, taking the train and especially taking  the existing rail routes, obviously,  it is much more environmentally friendly.  Considering these enormous construction projects,  these large infrastructures including the Rail Baltica project,  which you mentioned in particular  and with which  we opened our discussion.  Obviously, the environmental impact of such projects is significant.  Thus, it is really important to ask ourselves, especially whenever there is a launch of a new infrastructure,  can we really not do without this new infrastructure  and renovate what already exists? 

This is essential.  And then especially afterwards  to asses its real use.  It all depends on the use  and in particular the shift in traffic,  what this can create in relation to air travel.  But we must indeed be wary because  the constructions of  the railway line is something that is, from an environmental point of view,  extremely impactful. 

So, there you go, and then we must be wary of excesses and more  market oriented aspects, of greenwashing, of that sort.  So, there you have it.  You need to have sometimes a rational, reasonable approach.  Not everything is green when it comes to the train,  rather, quite the opposite.

Anubandh: “Not everything is green with the train”,  perhaps, with these words we should stop here.  Again, thank you very much!  And I hope one day to be able to ride all these  wonderful rail routes that you have proposed in this book.  And at that moment, I will be thinking of you! 

Thank you Antoine!

Antoine: Thank you Anubandh! 

Anubandh: Thank you so much! 


 

Antoine PECQUER

A graduate of the Lyon National Conservatory of Music, Antoine plays bassoon in various European orchestras.

He is the author of several books: « Géopolitique du rail (Autrement) », « Atlas de la culture (Autrement) », « Les espaces de la musique », « l’architecture des salles de concert (Parenthèses) », and « Les plus beaux opéras du monde (La Martinière) ».

 

 

No comments:

Post a Comment

The Geopolitics of Railway - मराठी

  जगातील सध्याच्या अत्यंत चिंताजनक अशा भू-राजकीय परिस्थितीत , मी पत्रकार आंत्वान पेकर यांच्या ‘रेल्वेची भू-राजनिति’ या उल्लेखनीय पुस्तकावर ...